Forgent Power Solutions closed its first fiscal year as a public company with the strongest quarter in its history, reporting earnings of $0.24 per share on revenue of $461.67 million for the June quarter. That topped the $0.22 consensus but matched the Earnings Whisper number of $0.24, so the print landed in line with the expectations that actually mattered heading into the report. The more consequential news was below the EPS line: revenue grew 94% year-over-year, adjusted EBITDA rose 163% to a record $113 million at a 24.4% margin, net income swung to $66 million from a small loss, and revenue, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income all cleared the high end of May guidance — the third straight quarter Forgent has beaten its own raised bar.
The demand data is what changed the story. Fourth-quarter bookings of $1.503 billion were up 375% year-over-year and 73% sequentially, producing a 3.3x book-to-bill versus 2.3x in the third quarter, and backlog ended at $3.0 billion, up 256% year-over-year and 53% sequentially — more than twice fiscal 2026 revenue, against roughly 1x a year ago. Management noted that a single quarter of orders exceeded the entire year's revenue. The call added the identity of the drivers: a first direct order from a frontier AI lab for a campus larger than one gigawatt, with a broader opportunity measured in multiple gigawatts, and a newly signed master service agreement with a hyperscaler. Powertrain Solutions is the engine within the engine, scaling from $46 million of revenue and a 16% mix two quarters ago to $147 million in the fourth quarter and roughly 40% of backlog, prompting a $35 million dedicated e-House and Powerskid facility in Tijuana that lifts total revenue capacity toward $5.8 billion when it comes online late in fiscal 2027.
Guidance was set aggressively and above the IPO model by a full year: fiscal 2027 revenue of $2.4 to $2.6 billion, adjusted EBITDA of $575 to $625 million, and adjusted EPS of $1.26 to $1.40, or 95% growth at the midpoint. Cash conversion also inflected, with fiscal 2026 operating cash flow of $109 million versus $45 million and management pointing to more than $300 million in fiscal 2027 as capex falls toward roughly 3% of sales. That shift is why M&A moved onto the fiscal 2027 capital allocation agenda alongside service and geographic expansion.
The offsets are real but mostly timing and disclosure. The first quarter carries about $10 million of one-time startup and underabsorption costs that push margin near 21% against a ~24% full-year framework, and revenue is weighted to the second half as backlog converts. Management is also discontinuing quarterly orders and backlog disclosure in favor of quarterly revenue and EBITDA guidance — defensible given lumpy gigawatt-scale orders, but it removes the single cleanest forward demand signal investors had been underwriting. Third-party gear inside solutions can dilute mix margins, and the ramp still depends on hiring execution.
The market setup is the conflicting part. Investor sentiment improved sharply, from -0.53 at the March report to -0.11 now, but remains marginally negative — an improvement in tone rather than a swing to enthusiasm, and the expectation lifecycle remains in the Negative Phase with the lifecycle trend still deteriorating even as momentum and anchored VWAP trends read positive, leaving the overall trend balance even. Shares are up 8.9% since the prior earnings open at $32.00, yet sit 11.6% below the $39.41 200-day moving average and 47.2% below the $66.00 52-week high set on June 22. Notably, the inter-earnings low of $29.50 was printed on the September 15 report date and the quarter high of $36.13 came the very next session, leaving price 18.1% off that low and 3.6% under the high — a violent re-rating debate unresolved.
The bottom line is that Forgent delivered an in-line result against the whisper but a materially better business: record bookings, a backlog now over 2x revenue, sequential margin expansion, a cash flow inflection, and fiscal 2027 guidance a year ahead of the IPO plan, with frontier-AI and hyperscaler relationships newly established. Sentiment has improved substantially but is not yet positive, the stock trades well below its 200-day moving average and far below its June peak, and the loss of quarterly backlog disclosure means investors will be asked to trust execution against guidance rather than verify demand each quarter. The fundamentals are accelerating faster than the market's willingness to pay for them, and the first quarter's margin dip is the near-term test of that patience.